What Manual Methods Can't Solve
Most municipalities rely on complaint-driven response, periodic visual surveys, and manual record-keeping to manage stray animal populations. These methods are labor-intensive, inconsistent across districts, and produce data that's outdated before it can inform decisions.

Stray populations shift territories, form and break social groups, and move between districts. Without continuous tracking, population data is always partial and always late.

Reactive Resource Allocation

Unmeasurable Program Outcomes

Health Risks Without Visibility
From Manual Observation to Continuous Intelligence

Track hundreds of animals across a district from a single dashboard. GNSS satellite positioning and LTE connectivity provide continuous location data without manual check-ins.

Territory and Movement Mapping

Health Monitoring for Welfare Programs
Data That Shapes Real Programs

Each collared animal has a continuous GPS and health record.
See how a stray population actually moves through a defined area. This data directly informs decisions about feeding station placement, population control priorities, and resource deployment.


The same collar hardware, LTE connectivity, and cloud data platform that tracks a campus population scales to a district or city-wide program.




